It’s a fact of life in the Big Four :you are there
to become a partner. This expectation may not be explicit in Big Four
culture, but the undercurrent is undeniable. If your every decision is
not focused on becoming a “member of the firm”, your career is in
perpetual jeopardy. The whole reason for your being is to attain that
status.
The mystique of the partnership is evaporating, and it could change
the character and composition of the Big Four fundamentally. Yes, Mr.
Dylan, the times, they are a-changin’. Anecdotally, more and more
senior managers talk quietly – never publicly – about what their next
moves would be. Those illicit conversations occurred in hushed tones
away from the office – often emerging from frank advice offered to more
junior staff members.
But, where do you go?
Many senior managers are considering VP and C-level positions
instead of shooting for the partnership. Citing lifestyle desires (i.e.
getting off the road), earning potential, and less politically charged
environments, even top-performing senior managers are exploring careers
outside the Big Four.
Aside from these internal pressures, up-and-comers clearly have
concerns about the resilience – and costs – of the partnership
structure. Once upon a time, the partnership buy-in was considered a
pristine investment opportunity. The past few years, though, have
called this perception into question.
It all started with Enron.
Many of the consultants and accountants in our community are still
in pain from the collapse of Andersen – especially the ex-Andersen folks
who have sought refuge at the remaining Big Four. Professionals who
worked at Andersen, especially former partners, are acutely aware of the
risks inherent in buying into the partnership. New partners, with
fewer than five years as members of Andersen, were brutalized
financially. Their buy-in loans were collateralized with their
partnership units. The collapse of Andersen led to a negative equity
situation for them; partners owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and
could not divest their units to repay the loans.
A similar fear rippled through KPMG, recently. Under investigation
for selling abusive tax shelters, KPMG settled with the Justice
Department. The settlement included a fine of $456 million. While KPMG
avoided the fate of Andersen, the resulting fine equates to around $300
thousand for each of KPMG’s 1,600 partners.
The declining interest in firm membership is supported by potential
changes in firm organization. Accenture and BearingPoint have forsaken
the partnership model, and both now trade on public markets. Doubts as
to the protections of the limited liability partnership model are
causing the Big Four to consider incorporation – instead of partnership.
Once recognized as an elite club in the accounting and consulting
industries, the major partnerships are losing their mystique. The firms
themselves continue to provide the best services available on the
market, but the firms themselves are undergoing a fundamental shift.
Every associate used to hope to grow up to become a partner. Senior
managers could taste it – and would think of nothing else.
The Big Four’s preferred structure is under attack from the outside.
Once considered an almost risk-free investment, we have learned from
Andersen and KPMG the contrary. This investment risk is magnified by
the erosion of protections offered by the LLP structure. Greener
pastures lure talent from the partnership while the legal system lays
siege to this venerable institution.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu